AS THE "MOST SENIOR" MEMBER OF ARBA I AM RESPONDING TO THE ABOVE POST. I THINK TOM MISSESS THE BOAT WHEN HE THINKS I PROTESTED THE TRADE OVER SOME "INCREDIBLY VALUABLE FTW PICK". I PROTESTED THE TRADE BECAUSE A RULE IS A RULE AND AS STATED BEFORE THE RULE DOES NOT TAKE INTO ACCOUNT ANYTHING ABOUT INTENT. IT ONLY TAKES INTO ACCOUNT WETHER A MANAGER OF TEAM ONE TRADES ONE OF HIS PROPERTIES TO TEAM HIS OWN TEAM TWO. THE VALUE OF THE ISSUE IN NO WAY SUPERCEDES THE IMPORTANCE OF THE RULE. I HAVE TAKEN ISSUE WITH SOME OF TOM'S DECESIONS IN THE PAST (ONE OF WHICH DIRECTLY IMPACTED ME), BUT; IN NO WAY THINK TOM IS NOT DOING AN OUTSTANDING JOB. WHEN THE TIME FOR A VOTE OF CONFIDENCE COMES HE WILL MOST CERTAINLY RECIEVE MY VOTE OF CONFIDENE AND WOULD ENCOURAGE OTHERS TO VOTE SIMILAR.